Psychosocial Risk vs Psychological Safety

Psychosocial risk mitigation and psychological safety are both crucial aspects of fostering a healthy and productive work environment, but they address different dimensions of the workplace. To understand how they complement rather than compete, let’s explore each concept and discuss their importance.

Psychosocial risk mitigation involves a comprehensive approach to identifying, managing, and alleviating factors within the work environment that can adversely affect employees’ mental health and well-being. This encompasses various elements, including the nature of job demands, levels of job control, the quality of interpersonal relationships, the overall organisational culture, and the broader societal context in which work occurs.

The significance of psychosocial risk mitigation lies in its ability to prevent and address issues such as workplace stress, burnout, and mental health challenges. High job demands, inadequate support structures, poor interpersonal relationships, and workplace harassment are among the factors that, if unaddressed, can lead to negative psychological outcomes for employees. By identifying and managing these risks, organisations can create a more supportive and health-promoting work environment.

Psychological safety on the other hand refers to the shared belief within a team or organisation that individuals can express their thoughts, opinions, and concerns without fear of negative consequences. It involves creating an atmosphere where team members feel comfortable taking interpersonal risks, such as asking questions, admitting mistakes, and proposing innovative ideas. This concept was popularised by Amy Edmondson from Havard Business School in the context of team dynamics and organisational culture.

Although different in theory and practice, Psychological safety is a critical factor for fostering innovation, collaboration, and open communication within a team or organisation. When individuals feel psychologically safe, they are more likely to share their insights, admit to errors, and engage in constructive dialogue. This creates a positive feedback loop, enhancing team performance, employee engagement, and overall organisational success, it also allows people to bring their ‘whole’ selves to work without fear of judgement or retribution.

Psychosocial risk mitigation and psychological safety are inherently interconnected. A psychologically safe environment can contribute to the mitigation of psychosocial risks by fostering a culture where employees feel secure in sharing their concerns or seeking help when needed. On the other hand, effectively managing psychosocial risks contributes to creating a foundation for psychological safety. While conceptually psychosocial risk mitigation can be viewed as addressing foundational needs related to well-being, psychological safety contributes to higher-level needs of the individual. These needs include a sense of belonging, esteem, and self-actualisation. Both aspects are integral for creating a workplace where employees can thrive both mentally and emotionally.

In terms of mental health outcomes, both psychosocial risk mitigation and psychological safety play major parts. Addressing psychosocial risks, such as high job demands, lack of control, and inadequate support, can significantly reduce stress levels among employees. Chronic stress is a known contributor to mental health issues, including anxiety and depression so preventing psychosocial risk helps create a calmer and more balanced work environment,
Which in turn contributes to burnout prevention (a state of emotional, physical, and mental exhaustion).

Creating a psychologically safe environment reduces anxiety and fear associated with expressing oneself at work. Fear of judgment or reprisal can contribute to anxiety so Psychological safety inherently provides a space where individuals feel secure and validated, another positive impact on general mental health. Psychological safety also fosters an environment where individuals feel comfortable expressing their thoughts and concerns openly, this reduces feelings of isolation and promotes a sense of connection and belonging and promotes collaboration. This strongly contributes to positive mental health outcomes by creating a sense of community and mutual support.

Psychosocial risk mitigation and psychological safety are mutually reinforcing. A work environment that effectively manages psychosocial risks contributes to a foundation of psychological safety and vice versa. Together, these concepts contribute to a holistic approach to employee well-being, addressing both the external stressors and the internal dynamics that impact mental health.
This dual focus is essential for cultivating a workplace where individuals can thrive both personally and professionally.

Check out our Other Blogs:

xmas holiday

Build up to the Christmas holidays

The lead up to Christmas can be an exceptionally stressful time in the building industry. There is mounting pressure to complete projects, increased demands from clients, and expectation to do longer days and weekend work.

people connecting

The Power of Connection

Over the last three editions, we looked at some of the key elements to daily functioning, sleep, breathing and physical care. So, what else is there? What brings all this together and gives it purpose? Connection.

physical care

The Fundamentals of Physical Care

Welcome to part three of our four-part journey on daily functioning. In the previous two Inhouse magazine editions we talked about the importance of a good night’s sleep and how to create good breathing habits.